Local Tree News – May 29, 2023

How wildfire risk is being managed in one WA forest – May 27, SeaTimes

City of Lynnwood releases results of Urban Forest Health Assessment – Lynnwood Today, May 27

Explore newly mapped trails in Seattle’s largest contiguous forest – May 26, SeaTimes

WEST SEATTLE PARKS: New ‘Tree Walk’ in Fauntleroy – West Seattle Blog, May 25

Tree Talk at Senior Center of West Seattle – West Seattle Blog, May 25

Seattle passes new tree ordinance amid calls to tweak legislation – KNKX, May 23

Seattle tree protection ordinance, years in the making, is up for a vote – SeaTimes, May 23

Seattle City Council passes tree ordinance after years of debate – SeaTimes, May 23

Seattle City Council passes new tree ordinance – May 23, Crosscut

Seattle speaks for its trees with overgrown set of new protections – Capitol Hill Blog, May 23

Applications invited for Edmonds Tree Board opening – MyEdmonds News May 22

Seattle’s proposed tree ordinance is the legislative equivalent of a chain saw – SeaTimes, May 19

Can Seattle balance its need for housing with its need for trees? – May 19, KNKX

‘Tree retention evaluation’ — City sorting out how to keep Cal Anderson’s maple trees and fix the sidewalk around the park – Capitol Hill Blog, May 17

Washington slates $50M for trees to shade salmon streams – May 16, Crosscut

Lake Forest Park neighbors denounce bus-lane plan that removes trees – SeaTimes, May 15

Reminder: Second community conversation about tree code updates scheduled May 15 – MyEdmonds News, May 13

Guest editorial: City should reconsider Discovery Park plan – May 11, Queen Anne News

City receives $29,500 grant to plant 100 street trees – MLT News, May 11

Keep funding projects that protect our state’s forests – Kitsap Sun, May 9

Bainbridge’s lip service to climate always yields to growth – Kitsap Sun, May 9

City Council considering more than 50 amendments to Seattle’s tree protections – Capitol Hill Blog, May 4

Living with Trees – Real Change News, May 3 (go Martha Baskin!)

Kubota Garden is a South Seattle gem. Keeping it free is a challenge – SeaTimes, May 2

Every Tree Helps – The Nature Conservancy and Tacoma’s GRIT, May 2

Sherwood state forest: Environmental impact – SeaTimes, April 28

Why must a small Mason County forest be harvested? – Kitsap Sun, April 28

WA budgets $2B to cut greenhouse gas emissions; here’s where money will go – SeaTimes April 27

Climate Action Shoreline: Act Now – Shoreline Area News, April 26

A ‘150-acre wonderland of forest and flowers’ awaits on Bainbridge Island – HeraldNet, April 26

Tell your Seattle City Council to pass strong tree protections – SeaTimes, April 25

Seattle can’t protect its urban forest without a census of its largest trees – SeaTimes, April 20

Careful tree thinning – April 19, Queen Anne News

5 types of all-season crabapples that thrive in the Pacific Northwest – SeaTimes, April 15

A trek into Spring in the mountains of eastern Washington – April 14, KNKX

WA, Seattle launch campaign to plant thousands of urban trees – SeaTimes, April 14

Washington launches new statewide tree-equity collaboration – April 13, Crosscut

Second annual Cherry Blossom Festival a blooming success – DailyUW, April 12

You might be responsible for a Seattle street tree and not know it – April 12, Crosscut

Podcast | Who owns the trees outside your window? – April 12, Crosscut

Forest Service wins Stillaguamish logging suit over conservation group – HeraldNet, April 12

Join the LFP tree board to plant a tree in Horizon View Park Saturday – Shoreline Area News, April 11

MEET JUSTIN URRESTI: TNC WASHINGTON’S WESTERN FORESTER – April 11, TNC

Design review: Tree preservation, parking, and new housing — A 13th Ave project with something for everyone on Capitol Hill – April 10, Capitol Hill Blog

Comment: Mature forests do more for climate, wildlife, water – HeraldNet, April 8

UW cherry blossoms reach peak bloom – SeaTimes, April 6

County zoning plans will destroy rural life in Kitsap – Kitsap Sun, April 4

Balancing the health of its ‘urban forest’ with ‘a critical need for more housing,’ Seattle shaping new tree protections – Capitol Hill Blog, March 30

Seattle Audubon tree petition!

Our friends at Seattle Audubon have put up a great tree petition – please take action and sign the petition!

Protect trees for a climate-resilient city.

The heatwave our region experienced at the end of June 2021 made clear that the deadly impacts of climate change are here. We must act now to improve our resilience and prepare for the future. An equitably distributed and protected urban forest is one of our best hopes for becoming a climate-resilient city. Join us in urging Seattle city leaders to improve urban forest protections today.

Seattle Urban Forestry Commission feedback on King County’s 30-year Forest Plan

The Seattle Urban Forestry Commission made the following recommendations to King County regarding it’s 30-year Forest Plan. You can see the original letter here.

March 11, 2020
Christie True, Department of Natural Resources and Parks Director
King Street Center, 201 S Jackson St
Seattle, WA 98104-3855

Dear Director True,
The Seattle Urban Forestry Commission (UFC) thanks Sarah Brandt for her updates regarding King County’s 30-year Forest Plan. The UFC supports this undertaking on a county level because of the complexity and interaction of the many different land uses and environmental issues involving forestry across the county.
King County is well-positioned to coordinate and share best practices and planning across the county by bringing together the many diverse stakeholders that benefit from and are impacted by decisions affecting our forested landscape. Seattle and other cities in King County have overlapping interests in maintaining, protecting, and
enhancing the benefits that urban forests provide to their dwellers. The following suggestions for the County may help municipalities better manage environmental concerns relating to forestry.

Assist Collection of High-Quality Tree Canopy Cover Data across the County
Without good data on trees and canopy cover, municipalities manage urban forests in the dark. The UFC suggests that King County could assist in periodic LIDAR studies to measure canopy cover across the county to provide baseline data for all cities, towns, and unincorporated areas in the county. Importantly, these studies
should be repeated at least every five years. These data will allow decision makers to assess gains and losses in tree canopy over time.

The UFC recommends that these studies measure canopy volume in addition to canopy cover. King County is losing large trees, especially in cities. Replanting with small trees may give a similar canopy area over time but does not fully replace the benefits large trees provide particularly well, including carbon sequestration,
stormwater mitigation, air quality improvement, wildlife support, and heat island impacts reduction. A LIDAR study can also help to clarify forest species diversity by doing a leaf off study to determine the percentage of evergreen and conifer species in an area.

Consider Cumulative and Ecosystem Level Impacts
Sharing information on climate impacts to trees and forests and ensuring species diversity and resilience is important. Looking at the total ecosystem impacts must be considered. Forestry is more than just trees. It includes associated plants, shrubs, and wildlife. The totality, interrelationships and functionality of forests, both
rural and urban, must be considered as the region grows in population.

Take Stock of and Value King County’s Natural Capital
Seattle is starting a Natural Capital Assessment to assign dollar values to its natural features and the benefits they provide. King County should consider a similar assessment as part of its forestry plan.

Convene Stakeholders, Leverage Partnerships, and Share Resources
Another way that King County can assist urban areas is by working with entities like the Washington State Department of Natural Resources’ Urban and Community Forestry Program, the US Forest Service’s Urban and Community Forestry Program, and King Conservation District in organizing workshops for municipalities to develop effective tree and urban forest ordinances and management plans. Convening stakeholders to discuss challenges and opportunities would greatly benefit the County in implementing an effective forest plan. By leveraging partnerships and sharing resources, cities across the county can manage urban forests in a regionally
coordinated manner and improve on efforts from work done in other areas.

The UFC also urges King County to make efforts to include other entities in its outreach and future involvement. These include dealing with Washington state entities like the Washington State Department of Transportation and the Washington State Department of Ecology as well as Federal Agencies that own land in King County.
Other important entities to include is exploring ways to involve school districts and students in efforts to protect and increase forests. These will be their forests in the future.

Consider a County-level Urban Forestry Advisory Board
King County has already created a Rural Forestry Commission. There is a need for a similar board for urban areas. Multiple tree and urban forest protection ordinances and management plans exist across the county. Each municipality has its own process for drafting and updating these ordinances and plans. While the basic issues are similar, cities act independently and frequently lack the resources and expertise to evaluate the benefits or problems associated with different ways of regulating tree and forest protection. The County could help coordinate efforts.

Thank you for your outreach and efforts to create a 30-year Forest Plan for King County. The UFC supports your efforts and looks forward to working with you.

Sincerely,
Weston Brinley, Chair; Steve Zemke

cc: Mayor Jenny A. Durkan, Council President Lorena González, CM Lisa Herbold, CM Debora Juarez, CM Andrew Lewis, CM Tammy Morales, CM Teresa Mosqueda, CM Alex Pedersen, CM Kshama Sawant, CM Dan Strauss, Jessica Finn Coven, Michelle Caulfield, Josh Baldi, Warren Jimenez, Sarah Brandt, Jessica Engel, Kathleen Farley Wolf, Paúl Quiñonez Figueroa

Sandra Pinto de Bader, Urban Forestry Commission Coordinator
City of Seattle, Office of Sustainability & Environment
PO Box 94729 Seattle, WA 98124-4729 Tel: 206-684-3194 Fax: 206-684-3013
www.seattle.gov/UrbanForestryCommission

WA Scotch Broom Census Set for May 2020

For Release: April 28, 2020

Contact: Justin Bush
Washington Recreation and Conservation Office
Cell:  360-704-0973

Scotch Broom Census Set for May

OLYMPIA–The Washington Invasive Species Council, state agencies and researchers are calling for a census in May to help determine the location of Scotch broom throughout the state.

“We need everyone’s help to size up the problem,” said Justin Bush, executive coordinator of the Washington Invasive Species Council. “Without baseline information about the location and population size, we don’t have enough details to determine solutions. The information from the census will help us set short- and long-term action plans.”

Yellow flowered, Scotch broom is hard to miss when blooming. It can be found in 30 of Washington’s 39 counties. While known to be spread across the state, specific locations and patch sizes are not well documented, leading to the council’s call for a month-long census.

How to Participate in the Scotch Broom Census

“We’re asking people to send us information from their neighborhoods,” Bush said. “The information can be transmitted easily to the council by using the Washington Invasives mobile app or by visiting https://invasivespecies.wa.gov/report-a-sighting/. Sightings should include a photograph of the plant that shows enough detail that the plant can be verified by an expert. A description of the size of the patch is also helpful, such as whether the patch is the size of a motorcycle, a car, a school bus or multiple school buses. Photographs also can be shared with the council on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter by using the hashtags #TheGreatScotchBroomCensus and #ScotchBroom2020Census.”

Scotch broom is a problem because it crowds out beneficial native species and clogs healthy habitats. It can form dense, impenetrable stands that are a problem for grazing, farming and recreating and it creates fire hazards. Dense stands may prevent or slow forest regeneration and harm sensitive areas near streams and wetlands. Scotch broom also produces toxic compounds, which in large amounts may poison grazing animals.

While widespread and not likely to be fully eliminated from the entire state, action is being taken to remove Scotch broom from parks, roadsides, forests, riverbanks and other at-risk landscapes. The information from the Scotch broom census will help invasive species managers better understand the needs of landowners and managers.

“We don’t have the resources at a state or local level to remove every Scotch broom,” said Greg Haubrich, pest program manager with the Washington State Department of Agriculture. “But organizations like your local noxious weed control board can provide education and technical assistance so that you can efficiently and effectively manage Scotch broom on your property. In some instances, there also could be cost-share funding available from your local conservation district to remove your Scotch broom.”

What You Can Do to Prevent the Spread

When around Scotch broom and any other invasive species, care should be taken not to inadvertently spread it to new locations. Each mature plant can produce thousands of seeds, which are viable up to 80 years. Taking precautions not to move seeds on boots, tires, pets or vehicles is very important.

“Scotch broom is widespread, but it is not everywhere,” Bush said. “By taking simple precautions, you can prevent the spread of this invasive species. Clean your boots, bikes, pets, vehicles and other gear before you venture outdoors to stop invasive species from hitching a ride to a new location. Conversely, follow the same practices before you head home to protect your own property.”

People that have Scotch broom or would like to get involved in stopping it can find additional help with an online seminar series June 2-4 being organized by the council and its partners, who are working together to share the newest information from throughout the Pacific Northwest so everyone can better address this shared problem.

Julia McNamara

Administrative Assistant

1111 Washington ST SE

Olympia WA 98501

Mailing Address

PO Box 40917

Olympia WA 98504-0917

(360) 902-2956

julia.mcnamara@rco.wa.gov

Outside City Hall – Saving Myers Way

An alliance of open-space activists and environmental-justice advocates win an important victory

By George Howland Jr – Outside City Hall, July 27, 2016

“You can fight city hall and win!

Earlier this month, the Seattle Green Spaces Coalition (Green Spaces) and TreePAC saved the Myers Way Parcels, 33 acres of open space in the middle of neighborhoods with poor air quality, concentrated poverty and a high number of people of color. Myers is bigger than Madrona Park and Beach (31 acres) and much bigger than Gas Works Park (19 acres).

In order to preserve Myers, the activists had to persuade Mayor Ed Murray to change course. He planned to sell the property to raise $5 million for homeless services. Now he will preserve Myers and find the money to fight homelessness elsewhere.

How did they do it?”

Read full article »

Green space proponents say ‘build parks’ on vacant substation lots rather than develop

 

TreePAC in the News:

Ballard News Tribune

 

Green space proponents say ‘build parks’ on vacant substation lots rather than develop

By Shane Harms

11/11/2014

North Seattle residents could start seeing more old utility substations developed, which is spurring some citizens to ask the City to think green.

The vacant lots are a way for the City to recoup financial losses due to budget cuts, and there is a history of the sites being sold to the highest bidder.

The properties are vacant land that used to be substations in the 50’s and 60’s and owned by Seattle City Light (SCL). As technology changed, fewer substations were needed. They are recognizable by small concrete surfaces where electrical equipment used to be. In 1968 there were 150 of these properties.

26 years ago, Cass Turnbull, founded Plant Amnesty, a green space advocacy group. Turnbull is a life long gardener and says that the City needs to prioritize green spaces, and that substations are an obvious choice.

“In my heart I get a lot of comfort from trees and green spaces, but I also know they serve a good utilitarian purpose. There is a suite of benefits from green spaces that the City desperately needs more than ever. They are a place to go for the public. They provide tree canopy and prevent runoff…selling them would be irresponsible.”

The sites are about the size of one or two house lots (5,000 square feet) and scattered throughout the city. There were nine in the Ballard area, but now two remain vacant (Sunset Hill: 3209 NW 65th St. and in Ballard: 6730 24th Ave. NW). Some were turned into parks and the rest were sold.

 

There are eight remaining vacant substations in the broader north Seattle area that are owned by the City and some of those properties are up for sale.

“The sites should be retained as green spaces. Instead they will most likely be sold for development – sold to the highest bidder… It rubs me the wrong way. These are perfectly good spaces that are going to developers, but they could be kept for public use,” said Turnbull.

One site that is in the process of being sold is the Green Lake substation at 949 N. 80th. The City approved the sale of the site last year. Bids are due November 14th.

Turnbull believes the site should be a vegetated buffer between the commercial area on Aurora and the neighboring residential building.

“The agent is collecting bids for the Green Lake Surplus Substation property now, but we are trying to stop this sale from happening and in the future.”

PlantAmnesty is working with the Green Space Coalition to turn other vacant sites across the city into green spaces for public use before the City sells them.

Turnbull has been monitoring the use of vacant substations for a long time and says she can “spot one going 40 miles.” She is watching 10 to 15 more potential City owned sites that will likely become surplus in the near future. Developers are likely doing the same. According to her notes, in 2002 SCL owned 53 surplus properties and so far, seven turned into parks, six went to public housing and three were put on hold for future use by SCL. Eight sites were sold to the highest bidder.

What about the neighbors?

Penny Barker has been living next to the substation in Sunset Hill for over 18 years. The vacant substation is directly behind Ristorante Picolinos, but unsuspecting citizens probably wouldn’t know it’s there unless they are looking for it. The substation is hidden from the street, accessible by alley only and vegetation riots around it.

“It’s really just fine the way it is. It’s becoming quite the green space with all the trees growing over it. Who needs to do anything with it? It could be a P-patch, or something quiet and green,” said Barker.

Barker is not optimistic about the fate of the substation.

“I do think the City will sell it to developers, and I know that the neighbors would be up in arms about it and feel strongly against it.”

Barker reported that in the past the City appraised the lot at $425, 000.

“It’s hard to imagine anyone would want to build something there unless it were really tall.”

Currently, there are no plans for the substation. At one point Ground Swell NW submitted a proposal for a solar panel station and park. SCL deemed the proposal “complex,” and tabled it.
Sunset Hill substation. Shane Harms

So how are substations sold?

During the official disposition process, before the properties are put on the market, the City offers to sell the land to other departments. They also look for potential buyers like the businesses next door. If the properties don’t sell, the City notifies the neighborhood. Sometimes with enough momentum, neighbors can lobby the Seattle City Parks Department to purchase a few of the properties if funding allows. If no takers, the properties are sold to the highest bidder. A similar scenario played out in Northeast Seattle in 2013 and is currently in the works in Southwest Seattle.

In 2006, Matt Rosenberg — founder and editor of Public Data Ferret — reported that SCL had 212 excess properties worth $35 million.

“ I get it. It makes sense that the City would want to sell lots to make up for cuts, but people are freaking out about development. I’m all for density, but responsible density; you need a giant park to go with giant buildings. I don’t know where these people are going to go.”

So why cant the City just hand over the sites to the Parks Department?

Washington State has laws that prevent one public agency from handing over property to another, which is an indirect result of laws set to prevent the public offices from getting into murky land deals with the private sector.

Turnbull, however, thinks there are ways to make the law work for green spaces.

“It looks like it’s impossible to save the lands based on the laws we have, but there are ways to work around it.”

In Turnbull’s eyes, one way to look at the substations is that they are energy-conservation sites; substations could be made into City managed tree banks. Turnbull says that trees conserve energy, especially in the summer, providing a cool place for people to go rather than turning on air conditioners, saving the City and citizens money. She also said green sites act as the lungs of the city and cut back on carbon emissions and also filters runoff. Seattle Public Utilities is already building rain gardens all over Ballard to prevent runoff from overwhelming the sewer system.

“The tree banks could turn the vacant lots into a park or an orchid or a garden — anything really.”

Furthermore, Turnbull thinks that if a developer wants to develop a potential site that has the capacity for saving the City and citizen’s money and protecting the environment, they should have to pay impact fees to develop.

As for the substations in Ballard, they are not for sale yet. However, there is talk that the Northwest substations are up for disposition as soon as the Southwest dispositions are finished in later 2015.

“We have enough development and not enough green space. We are well on our way to meet development goals than we are for green space. It’s easier to retain land rather than turn it into a green space after its been developed.”